Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1184 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1168 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1142 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | 1123 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1118 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1158 |
Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1160 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 12B or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Qwen1.5-110B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.