Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Mistral Small 3.1
Gemma 3 12B and Mistral Small 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 31.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 12B leads 47.5 to 37.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.7% for Gemma 3 12B and 3.9% for Mistral Small 3.1.
- Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $0.56 for Mistral Small 3.1.
- Gemma 3 12B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 31.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 128K |
| Max output | 8K | 102K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.56 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1309 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Mistral Small 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1278 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | 127.48 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
Math Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | 3.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1262 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
Knowledge Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | 41.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1257 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1255 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1253 |
| LMArena French | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1264 |
| IFEval | — | 75% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1277 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | 761 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1270 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Mistral Small 3.1?
Gemma 3 12B and Mistral Small 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 31.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Mistral Small 3.1?
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 lists at $0.35 and $0.56.
Is Gemma 3 12B or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?
Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 12B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Mistral Small 3.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.