Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Ministral 3B

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 1 category and Ministral 3B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3 12B leads 26.5 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 39.5% for Gemma 3 12B and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.
  • Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.10 for Ministral 3B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Ministral 3B specifications
Gemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index32.126.2
Released2025-03-122024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K131K
Max output8K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$0.10
Results tracked246

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
SciCode17.4%—
LMArena Coding1281—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Ministral 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Ministral 3B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
DTBench48.8%51.7%
LMCA4.5%5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5118.1
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1309—

Math Ministral 3B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—
LMArena Math1307—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond39.5%25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%7.3%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Ministral 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1318—
LMArena German1370—
LMArena Russian1335—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1299—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1317—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1334—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—
LMArena Multi-Turn1334—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Ministral 3B?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Ministral 3B?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Ministral 3B lists at $0.10 and $0.10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Ministral 3B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper