Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Granite 4.1 8b

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

31.8

Rank #255 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 33.8 to 21.0.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Gemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index31.836.8
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276), Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding12811313
LMArena WebDev—1190
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101), Granite 4.1 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307), Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts13091294
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.49—

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273), Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math13071311
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250), Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert12481310
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Granite 4.1 8b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English13181261
LMArena Russian13351238
LMArena Chinese—1335
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179), Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following12991268

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query13171275

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text13341291
LMArena Creative Writing13311249
LMArena Multi-Turn13341269
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.1 8b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper