Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Yi-34B
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-34B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-34B leads 34.1 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1112 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Yi-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 117.39 |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1114 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | 76% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 42.3% | 76.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1061 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Yi-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Yi-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1091 |
Long Context Yi-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Yi-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Yi-34B?
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Yi-34B better for coding?
Yi-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Yi-34B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.