Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 18.8.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.639.9
Released2024-02-212026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1010—
HumanEval+20.7%—
MBPP+34.1%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2144.64
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts989—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1009—
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
MMLU42.3%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English958—
LMArena Chinese986—
LMArena Russian937—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following970—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query981—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 2BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1002—
LMArena Creative Writing987—
LMArena Multi-Turn945—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper