Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Pixtral Large
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Pixtral Large leads 32.9 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Pixtral Large leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Pixtral Large leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.