Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Ministral 3B
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 2 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2B leads 30.0 to 26.6.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 118.1 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Ministral 3B?
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Ministral 3B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.