Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1457 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1442 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1445 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1420 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1452 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.