Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Yi-Lightning

Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Yi-Lightning 01.AI

37.1

Rank #209 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Lightning in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Yi-Lightning leads 36.2 to 9.9.
  • Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Yi-Lightning specifications
Gemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index25.937.1
Released2024-06-242024-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Coding11731312
Aider Polyglot—12.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts11711302
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Math11831300
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Expert11471286
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Non-English11881269
LMArena Chinese11851320
LMArena French11901305
LMArena German11861267
LMArena Japanese11441228
LMArena Korean11371192
LMArena Russian12001255
LMArena Spanish12001315

Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following11781278
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Longer Query11971297

Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BYi-Lightning
LMArena Text12071302
LMArena Creative Writing12061280
LMArena Multi-Turn11931311
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Yi-Lightning?

Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

Gemma 2 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Yi-Lightning share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper