Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.7

Rank #334 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3 leads 25.0 to 9.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.5% for Gemma 2 9B and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Gemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index25.730.9
Released2024-06-242025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked3524

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%45.3%
LMArena Coding11741246
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%50.4%
LiveBench Coding22.5%—

Reasoning Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
LMArena Hard Prompts11721233
Epoch Capabilities Index119.78127.06
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%6.7%
LMArena Math11831240
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond27.5%47.3%
LMArena Expert11471202
Confabulations—25.2%
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English11881198
LMArena Chinese11851204
LMArena French11891202
LMArena German11861211
LMArena Japanese11441111
LMArena Korean11371188
LMArena Russian12001216
LMArena Spanish1200—

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following11781214
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query11971246

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3
LMArena Text12071234
LMArena Creative Writing12061195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841707
LMArena Multi-Turn11931217
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Mistral Small 3 share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper