Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 35.4 to 9.9.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1269 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1265 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1238 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1286 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1279 |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1245 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1265 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.