Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 30.6 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1149 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1138 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1159 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1131 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1138 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context Gemma 2 9B leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1099 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.