Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1399 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1427 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.