Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Phi-4 Mini
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.9 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Phi-4 Mini?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.