Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Phi-1.5
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#244); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 90.82 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Phi-1.5?
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#244); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Phi-1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.