Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.5 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1016 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 993 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.