Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 29.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 43.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1469 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.95 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1461 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1432 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1433 |
Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiniMax-M3 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.