Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1445 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.