Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Hy4 preview
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 30.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 44.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.83 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1633 |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 75% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Hy4 preview?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Hy4 preview better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Hy4 preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.