Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.2 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 39.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1308 |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1273 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1278 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.