Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 2 2b IT vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 63.4 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

63.4

Rank #9 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 leads 72.8 to 21.4.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index33.163.4
Released—2026-04-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$5
Output $ / M tokens—$30
Results tracked1771

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), GPT-5.5: 58.2 (#17)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Coding11121494
SWE-bench Verified—80.6%
DeepSWE—67%
FrontierCode—43%
LMArena WebDev—1513
SciCode—56.1%
GSO—40.2%
WeirdML—84.9%
MirrorCode—10%
ALE-Bench—1,943

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, GPT-5.5: 50.7 (#6)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
Terminal-Bench—84.7%
APEX-Agents—55.1%
OSWorld 2.0—13%
Remote Labor Index—6.3%
τ²-bench Banking—44.6%
DeepResearch Bench—54%
PostTrainBench—27.2%
ExploitBench—47.4%
GBAEval—53.2%
GDP.pdf—26%
LMArena Search—1242
Vending-Bench 2—7,524

Reasoning GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), GPT-5.5: 72.8 (#11)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Hard Prompts11131489
ARC-AGI-2—85%
SimpleBench—69%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—88.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—96.2%
ARC-AGI-1—95%
CritPt—27.1%
Chess Puzzles—54%
EBR-Bench—34.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—54.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—88.1%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—159.1
ForecastBench—60.6

Math GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), GPT-5.5: 81.7 (#11)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Math11351486
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—85.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—72.5%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—94.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—50%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—51.7%
FrontierMath Erdős—0%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—35.4%

Knowledge GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), GPT-5.5: 64.4 (#17)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Expert10961508
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—63%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, GPT-5.5: 46.9 (#12)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Vision—1297
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%
LMArena Document—1486

Multilingual GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), GPT-5.5: 56.4 (#20)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Non-English11211467
LMArena Chinese11321533
LMArena French11571486
LMArena German11141480
LMArena Japanese10831498
LMArena Korean10551460
LMArena Russian11181473
LMArena Spanish11401468

Instruction Following GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), GPT-5.5: 77.5 (#18)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Instruction Following11181479

Long Context GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), GPT-5.5: 48.3 (#12)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Longer Query11301484
CL-bench Life—22.2%

Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), GPT-5.5: 72.7 (#13)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-5.5
LMArena Text11561472
LMArena Creative Writing11471455
LMArena Multi-Turn11181476
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1844
EQ-Bench 4—1315

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 63.4 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GPT-5.5 better for coding?

GPT-5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.2 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GPT-5.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 has 71.

Related comparisons

Go deeper