Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral 7B
Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 2 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.2 to 30.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.5% for Gemma 2 27B and 27.3% for Mistral 7B.
- Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
- Gemma 2 27B accepts more context: 8K tokens versus 8K.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2023-09-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | 8K |
| Max output | 2K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | 19.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1082 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 27.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |
Reasoning Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1067 |
| DTBench | 48% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | 112.21 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |
Math Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1085 |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | 3.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 15.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1036 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 62.5% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |
Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1009 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1037 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 878 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1018 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1026 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1060 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1060 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1062 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Mistral 7B?
Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 2 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Mistral 7B?
Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Mistral 7B better for coding?
Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B does, with 8K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Mistral 7B share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.