Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral

Gemma 2 27B and Mistral score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.2

Rank #302 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.4

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral leads 20.5 to 10.0.
  • Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Mistral specifications
Gemma 2 27BMistral
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index29.229.4
Released2024-06-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window8K—
Max output2K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.65—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked3422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243), Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Coding12111162
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning Mistral leads

Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313), Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts11991149
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.06—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math Mistral leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306), Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Math12121180
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%
LiveBench Math26.5%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275), Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Expert11721125
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
Confabulations27.1%—
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%
MMLU75.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221), Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Non-English12171129
LMArena Chinese12211109
LMArena French12461179
LMArena German12091155
LMArena Japanese11751012
LMArena Korean11741032
LMArena Russian12341168
LMArena Spanish12281143

Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244), Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Instruction Following12061152
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213), Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Longer Query12311154

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220), Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral
LMArena Text12311165
LMArena Creative Writing12411158
LMArena Multi-Turn12241147
WildBench—66%
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Mistral?

Gemma 2 27B and Mistral score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Mistral better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.5 vs 33.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper