Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 10.7.
  • Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Gemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index29.438.6
Released2024-06-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window8K—
Max output2K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.65—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding12111307
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts11981286
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.08—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math12121281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
LiveBench Math26.5%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11721276
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
MMLU75.7%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12171265
LMArena Chinese12211346
LMArena Russian12341266
LMArena French1247—
LMArena German1209—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1174—
LMArena Spanish1228—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12061277
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12311341

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12311288
LMArena Creative Writing12411264
LMArena Multi-Turn12241284
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper