Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 33.0 to 10.7.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index29.432.4
Released2024-06-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K—
Max output2K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.65—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked3413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding12111186
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11981145
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.08—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Math12121152
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
LiveBench Math26.5%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert11721142
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
MMLU75.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12171099
LMArena Chinese12211145
LMArena Russian12341092
LMArena French1247—
LMArena German1209—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1174—
LMArena Spanish1228—

Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12061131
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—

Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12311162

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text12311150
LMArena Creative Writing12411129
LMArena Multi-Turn12241108
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (34.1 vs 34.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper