Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

30.7

Rank #275 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.4 to 30.6.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.747.3
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked1937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding10841467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts10711449
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.67

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math11071450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Expert10391456
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English10521424
LMArena Chinese10601478
LMArena French10641454
LMArena German10541451
LMArena Japanese9711389
LMArena Korean9881381
LMArena Russian10461434
LMArena Spanish10491432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10571425

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query10561440
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text10941437
LMArena Creative Writing10591405
LMArena Multi-Turn10401438

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper