Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Phi-2
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#277); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | 45% | 54.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.94 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Phi-2?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#277); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Phi-2 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.