Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 30.4.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index31.343.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding10841469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts10711447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math11071429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert10391461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English10521420
LMArena Chinese10611463
LMArena French10651447
LMArena German10541426
LMArena Japanese9711381
LMArena Korean9881372
LMArena Russian10461428
LMArena Spanish10491432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following10571433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query10561445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text10941433
LMArena Creative Writing10601404
LMArena Multi-Turn10401442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiniMax-M3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper