Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 30.4.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1444 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1403 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1405 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.