Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 30.4.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index31.348.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding10841504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10711482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11071468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert10391501

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English10521434
LMArena Chinese10611511
LMArena French10651475
LMArena Russian10461409
LMArena Spanish10491456
LMArena German1054—
LMArena Japanese971—
LMArena Korean988—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10571463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query10561463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text10941455
LMArena Creative Writing10601400
LMArena Multi-Turn10401451

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper