Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #25 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 20.5.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index31.355.0
Released—2026-07-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1952

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Coding10841474
DeepSWE—53.8%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1553
SciCode—54.1%
WeirdML—46.4%
ALE-Bench—1,309
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
APEX-Agents—56.2%
τ²-bench Banking—47.9%
PostTrainBench—23.4%
GBAEval—65.4%
GDP.pdf—14%
LMArena Search—1213
Vending-Bench 2—3,887

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10711462
ARC-AGI-2—52.6%
SimpleBench—70%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—83.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.9%
ARC-AGI-1—87.2%
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—36%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—45.2%
Surface Evolver Bench—74.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.92

Math Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Math11071459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.8%
ProofBench—31%

Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Expert10391466
GPQA Diamond—93.4%
SimpleQA Verified—48.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Vision—1288
Blueprint-Bench 2—27.3%
Furniture Assembly—22.5%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Non-English10521440
LMArena Chinese10611496
LMArena French10651456
LMArena German10541446
LMArena Japanese9711428
LMArena Korean9881404
LMArena Russian10461448
LMArena Spanish10491450

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Instruction Following10571446

Long Context Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Longer Query10561463

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGrok 4.5
LMArena Text10941448
LMArena Creative Writing10601442
LMArena Multi-Turn10401456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Grok 4.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper