Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 30.4.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 41.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1435 |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1422 |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1417 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1437 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.