Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 48.6 to 30.4.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1287 |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 46.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1272 |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 54.8% |
| DTBench | — | 65.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 54.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.48 |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 11.5% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
Knowledge Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1254 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 53.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.1% |
Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1289 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1318 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1287 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1244 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1237 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1281 |
Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1270 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 69.6% |
Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1290 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 45.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.