Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs GPT-5.3 Chat
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 30.4.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 42.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $14 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1408 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1399 |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1389 |
Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1397 |
Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1384 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1352 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1371 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1378 |
Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1396 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1355 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1412 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1690 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than GPT-5.3 Chat?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or GPT-5.3 Chat better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and GPT-5.3 Chat share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.