Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Yi-Large
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.7 to 30.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-Large leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 47.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Yi-Large?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Yi-Large better for coding?
Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Yi-Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.