Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.3 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 40.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1366 |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1332 |
Long Context Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Step 3 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.