Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1028 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1089 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 984 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1016 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1006 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1004 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1023 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.