Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

28.8

Rank #313 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.9 to 25.3.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index28.835.3
Released—2024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding10341209
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10051202

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math10471216

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert9701171

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English9881206
LMArena Chinese10111214
LMArena German9441192
LMArena Korean8991148
LMArena Russian9901219
LMArena French—1196
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following9921203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10031225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text10221225
LMArena Creative Writing9981203
LMArena Multi-Turn9581214

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper