Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.6 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 49.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1532 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1490 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.18 |
Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1485 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1304 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1479 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1466 |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1444 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1504 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Muse Spark 1.2 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.