Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Small 3.2
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.0 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.