Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 40.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.35 |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1431 |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1432 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1442 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1409 |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1415 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.