Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Large 4 leads 60.4 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-10-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.68 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.09 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1475 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1541 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1444 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 27.4% |
Math Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1488 |
Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1447 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20% |
Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1415 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1491 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1414 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1424 |
Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1429 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1424 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Large 4 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.