Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 25.1.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index29.343.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1641

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding10341469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts10051447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math10471429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert9701461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English9881420
LMArena Chinese10121463
LMArena German9441426
LMArena Korean8991372
LMArena Russian9901428
LMArena French—1447
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following9921433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query10031445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text10221433
LMArena Creative Writing9981404
LMArena Multi-Turn9591442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiniMax-M3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper