Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.5 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 34.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
Math Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1249 |
Knowledge Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1222 |
Multilingual Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1225 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1248 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1224 |
| LMArena French | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1269 |
Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1254 |
Long Context Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Magistral Medium share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.