Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Llama 3.2 11B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSide by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 32.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Llama 3.2 11B: 27.3
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 16.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| MMLU | — | 56.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Llama 3.2 11B: 24.4
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 966 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Llama 3.2 11B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Llama 3.2 11B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.