Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Llama 2-34B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 44.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105.2 |
| PIQA | — | 81.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 76.7% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 42.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 54.5% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.7% |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 84.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Llama 2-34B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Llama 2-34B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.