Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.53 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1465 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
Math Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1475 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1461 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1496 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1390 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1435 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1425 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1443 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1442 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1399 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1436 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Hy3 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.