Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 19.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 36.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.