Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-5 Nano
GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5 Nano in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-5 Nano leads 75.0 to 49.9.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 33.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Nano leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1351 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 34.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 38.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 718.67 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 21.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 51.5% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1328 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 20.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 27% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| DTBench | — | 62.7% |
| LMCA | — | 7.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.38 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.1 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1317 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 81.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 12% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 54.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Nano leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1321 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 69.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 11.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1159 |
| VPCT | — | 37.2% |
Multilingual GPT-5 Nano leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1356 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1327 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1296 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Nano leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1306 |
| IFEval | — | 93.2% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference GPT-5 Nano leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1311 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 705 |
| WildBench | — | 80.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GPT-5 Nano?
GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-5 Nano share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 49.